STUDY
BACKGROUND:
In
1996 local geologist Diane Conrad visited a crop circle which
had occurred near her home in Logan, Utah. The formation,
the first one reported in the general area, caused quite a
stir locally and resulted in a local radio interview with
Nancy Talbott about the BLT Research Team's previous crop
circle research and results. In that interview Michigan scientist
W.C. Levengood's hypothesis that some sort of atmospheric
plasma system might be involved was discussed at length--in
particular the fact that plants and soils at cropcircle sites
had been shown by Levengood et al. to exhibit abnormalities
consistent with their exposure to brief bursts of intense
heat. Also pointed out was the fact that plasmas are known
to emit microwaves when they spiral, and thus could be a possible
source of this heat.
Having written her Master's Thesis
on heat effects on clay minerals, Ms. Conrad reasoned that
certain expandable clays in the soils at cropcircle sites
might provide additional evidence of this heating action.
If the soils, and these expandable clay minerals (illites/smectites),
had been exposed to unusual heating it was possible that a
change in the degree of crystallinity might have occurred.
Since Ms. Conrad was familiar with both the particular measure
of crystallinity (the Kubler Index) and the X-ray diffraction
(XRD) methodology utilized to obtain this information, she
decided to carry out preliminary testing on the 1996 Logan,
Utah crop circle soils.
Ms. Conrad's results from this preliminary XRD investigation
were intriguing. The soil sample from within the crop circle
showed a pronounced decrease in the Kubler Index of the illite
peak, as compared to the control (S=0.11; C=0.25), indicating
increased crystallinity in the circle sample. Ms.
Conrad then took the 3 remaining aliquots of the control sample
and heated the first in a conventional oven for ten minutes
at 93ßC and the second for ten minutes at 287ßC;
the third was microwaved for two minutes to determine the
effects of energy of different wavelengths on the crystal
structure. In these three heated control samples the Kubler
Index consistently decreased (from 1.0 to 0.07), with the
microwaved aliquot producing a Kubler Index most similar to
that of the circle sample.
|
For details
of the 1996 Logan, Utah
cropcircle report, click on BLT Lab
Report #79 (left). |
It must be kept in
mind that this increase in degree of crystallization (greater
ordering of the atoms) in clay minerals has not been documented
in surface soils before. Such changes are typically seen in
sedimentary rock which has been exposed--for hundreds, if
not thousands, of years--to both heat from the earth's core
and the massive pressure of tons of overlying rock. If such
a change were to be demonstrated (with statistical significance)
in surface soils in an in-depth study at crop circle sites,
it would certainly inspire increased academic interest in
the causative mechanism behind the crop circle phenomenon.
In 1999 New York philanthropist Laurance S. Rockefeller provided
BLT Inc. with the funds needed to implement this in-depth
XRD examination of expandable clay minerals (illites/smectites)
in crop circle soils.
STUDY CASE
SELECTION:
A number of crop circles in several countries were considered
as potential candidates for this study, and there were multiple
factors which guided our final choice. We relied heavily on
the research published by W.C. Levengood et al. (1994;
1995;
1999)
over the years to help us choose a productive study case,
and paid specific attention to BLT
Lab Report #79 (see above) which states that both
multiple expulsion cavities and statistically significant
apical node-length increases were documented in the
plants in the Logan, Utah crop formation. Additionally, we
noted that the crop-lay in the upper-most plants in both circles
in the Logan formation had been more radial than spiral
(radial crop-lays are less common than spiral lays).
Four crop circles (one in Holland, one in the U.S. and two
in Canada) were evaluated preliminarily as candidates for
this study. All of these cases provided statistically significant
apical node-length increases in the plants, as well as the
presence of expulsion cavities, and two had the radial lay
in evidence. Preliminary XRD examination of the soils in all
but the Holland case also suggested increases in the crystalline
structure of the illite/smectites in the soils.
In the Holland event we had a reliable eye-witness to the
circle forming underneath a disc-shaped light which had hovered
over the field, but the soils from this field were extremely
rich, containing very little clay, and it became apparent
that the extraction of the clays in preparation for X-ray
diffraction was not cost-effective for this study. The U.S.
case not only had node-length increases and expulsion cavities
present, it also was one of the first cases where the massively
twisted and spiraled stem at the base of the seed-head was
observed. However, the field-team in this instance had misunderstood
the sampling protocol and there were not enough controls available.
And, in one of the two Canadian cases, the farmer had mowed
quite a bit of the field surrounding the formation prior to
the BLT field-team's sampling, thus making it impossible to
obtain both plant and soil samples at all the required locations.
|
|
The fourth case,
a seven-circle formation (overall length 191 ft.) in barley
at Edmonton, Alberta, Canada in September, 1999 was the only
case of the four which could be examined within our budget
and which also met all of our basic criteria and, so, it was
chosen for the in-depth XRD study. Unknown to us at the time,
this Edmonton formation would turn out to be one of the most
interesting crop circles we have studied so far.
|
The apical node
elongation was so extreme at Edmonton that it was clearly
visible in the field (and subsequently confirmed to be statistically
significant by W.C. Levengood), and the sampling-team found
massive numbers of expulsion cavities all the way down the
barley stems, in some instances involving the apical node
also. The lay of the crop in all seven circles was complex,
with an uppermost layer chaotically laid in varying directions,
a radially-laid layer beneath that, with an underlying, narrow,
counter-clockwise ring of flattened crop around the perimeter
of each of the seven circles.
|
|
Diagram
and Photo: J. Arndt |
This formation was
found by the farmer (who subsequently reported that he had
observed multiple circles the previous year in an adjacent
field, which he had thought might be caused by deer bedding
down) at harvest, and was not visible from the nearest roads.
The fact that the field was infested with Canadian thistle,
which made it almost impossible to walk in the field without
high protective boots, tended to further rule out the possibility
that this formation had been mechanically produced.
|
Finally, fieldworkers
Mike and Judy Arndt--in spite of the Canadian thistle--carried
out a thorough, comprehensive sampling and precise documentation
of the field situation, thus making this Edmonton case overall
the best candidate. For those knowledgeable about the crop
circle phenomenon it is interesting to note that, during the
sampling work, cell-phone failure inside the circles was observed
by the Arndts and unusual aerial light phenomena was reported
by the farmer and his wife and at least one other unrelated
individual during the time-period when this formation was
thought to have occurred.
|
|
To read the entire original BLT Lab Report #122
on the Edmonton case, click on diagram at left.
|
SAMPLING
PROCEDURE:
Plant samples, consisting of 15-20 plants/sample, cut
off at just above the soil level, were taken along multiple
diameters at precise intervals (which varied, depending upon
overall circle size) in three of the seven circles that made
up the Edmonton crop formation. In some samples the number
of plants/sample varies because of the heavy infestation of
thistle, which made it impossible in every sampling location
to obtain 15-20 plants adjacent to each other. Magnetic North
was determined by the field-team and, in two of the sampled
circles, this diameter was sampled.
Previous plant research had indicated that, in crop formations
comprised of multiple-sized circles, the most significant
plant changes often occur in the smaller-diameter circles.
The field-team was unable to complete the full sampling of
the smaller circle in this case, in spite of which the plant
data revealed interesting results.
Plant controls, also consisting of 15-20 plants/sample
cut off at the base, were taken along four different control
lines beginning at 75 ft. away from the flattened edges of
various sections of the formation and continuing to between
175 ft. - 265 ft. away from the flattened edges, at 25 ft.
intervals. (Click on sampling diagrams below to see in
full size.)
All plant samples and controls
were wrapped in newspaper, secured and labeled with the appropriate
sample or control number, and dropped in situ until the soil
sampling had also been completed. Each sample and control
location was registered on the field sampling diagram.
Soil samples and controls, consisting of approximately
1/2 cup of surface soil at each location (down to a depth
not exceeding 1/2 inch), were taken immediately around each
plant sampling location and then placed in plastic bags and
labeled.
The fieldwork took three days to complete (September 30, October
1 & 2, 1999), after which the plant samples were allowed
to dry for an additional three weeks, prior to shipping to
Michigan for the initial plant and soil analyses.
PLANT
RESULTS:
Twenty-three
control sets (approx. 230 plants) and seventy-one sample
sets (approx. 710 plants) were examined by Michigan biophysicist
W.C. Levengood. Two of the most reliable indicators (node-length
increase and the presence of expulsion cavities) that
an unusual energy system had impacted the plants inside
the flattened circles were found. [Both of these abnormalities
are thought to be caused by a rapid, intense exposure
of the plants to heat (microwaves?) which turns the internal
stem moisture to steam. Depending on (a) the elasticity
of the plant fibers (younger tissues are more elastic),
(b) the amount of moisture inside the plant stems, and
(c) the intensity and/or duration of the heating agency
itself, the steam either stretches the apical node of
the plant and/or bursts holes through the lower nodes
as it escapes. See published papers, 1994;
1995;
1999.]
|
(1) Expulsion cavities
(holes blown out at the plant stem nodes) were found in 68%
of the 71 plant sample sets; none were found in the 23 control
sets. These expulsion cavities were found not only in the
apical node (1st node beneath the seed-head) and in the penultimate
node (2nd node beneath the seed-head), but also in the third
node beneath the seed-head--with multiple expulsion cavities
observed in many of the plant stems, the first time that this
had been documented in the laboratory.
(2) Apical node-elongation levels in all of the 71
plant sample sets were significantly higher (p <0.01) than
the overall control level. All three sampled circles disclosed
very significant node-length increases, with the plants from
the smallest circle showing the greatest node-elongation (+109%).
The 5 tables below contain the complete plant data obtained
by W.C. Levengood.
Table 1:
Plant Data - Controls
Edmonton, Canada Crop Circle
September, 1999
|
CONTROL
LOCATION |
CONTROL
NUMBER |
MEAN
APICAL
NODE LENGTH (mm) |
EXP.
CAVITIES/
SAMPLE SET
(APICAL NODES) |
NUMBER
OF PLANTS
PER SET* |
|
75' |
W |
C-1 |
3.22
mm |
0 |
9 |
100' |
W |
C-2 |
3.13
mm |
0 |
9 |
125' |
W |
C-3 |
2.97
mm |
0 |
11 |
150' |
W |
C-4 |
3.18
mm |
0 |
10 |
175' |
W |
C-5 |
3.33
mm |
0 |
10 |
|
75' |
S |
C-6 |
2.93
mm |
0 |
10 |
100' |
S |
C-7 |
3.09
mm |
0 |
10 |
125' |
S |
C-8 |
3.44
mm |
0 |
10 |
150' |
S |
C-9 |
3.44
mm |
0 |
10 |
175' |
S |
C-10 |
3.72
mm |
0 |
10 |
200' |
S |
C-11 |
4.91
mm |
0 |
10 |
|
75' |
SE |
C-12 |
3.72
mm |
0 |
10 |
100' |
SE |
C-13 |
3.34
mm |
0 |
10 |
125' |
SE |
C-14 |
3.32
mm |
0 |
10 |
150' |
SE |
C-15 |
2.97
mm |
0 |
10 |
175' |
SE |
C-16 |
2.73
mm |
0 |
11 |
|
90' |
NW |
C-17 |
3.21
mm |
0 |
10 |
115' |
NW |
C-18 |
3.05
mm |
0 |
11 |
140' |
NW |
C-19 |
3.35
mm |
0 |
10 |
165' |
NW |
C-20 |
3.44
mm |
0 |
10 |
190' |
NW |
C-21 |
3.23
mm |
0 |
10 |
215' |
NW |
C-22 |
3.92
mm |
0 |
10 |
240' |
NW |
C-23 |
3.71
mm |
0 |
8 |
265' |
NW |
C-24 |
- |
- |
- |
|
*Notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Number
of plants/set in this chart reflects the number
of plants which arrived at the laboratory fully
intact and, thus, usable for the study. |
(2) |
No
plant data was presented for Control #24 (C-24).
|
|
Table
2:
Plant Data - Samples, Circle "C"
Edmonton, Canada Crop Circle
September, 1999 |
SAMPLE
# |
MEAN
APICAL
NODE LENGTH (mm) |
EXP.
CAVITIES/
SAMPLE SET
(Apical Nodes Only) |
NUMBER
PLANTS/SET |
[Circle "C,"
100' diameter center circle]
|
S-1 |
4.51
mm |
3 |
8 |
S-2 |
5.54
mm |
0 |
11 |
S-3 |
5.92
mm |
4 |
9 |
S-4 |
5.20
mm |
5 |
9 |
S-5 |
6.19
mm |
2 |
10 |
S-6 |
5.62
mm |
3 |
10 |
S-7 |
5.51
mm |
2 |
9 |
S-8 |
7.56
mm |
0 |
7 |
S-9 |
5.89
mm |
1 |
9 |
S-10 |
5.36
mm |
1 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
S-11 |
4.35
mm |
1 |
10 |
S-12 |
4.84
mm |
4 |
10 |
S-13 |
5.04
mm |
6 |
10 |
S-14 |
4.92
mm |
3 |
10 |
S-15 |
6.46
mm |
3 |
10 |
S-16 |
5.71
mm |
1 |
11 |
S-17 |
5.34
mm |
0 |
8 |
S-18 |
5.15
mm |
2 |
10 |
S-19 |
5.34mm |
0 |
9 |
S-20 |
6.98
mm |
1 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
S-21 |
4.61
mm |
2 |
9 |
S-22 |
5.86
mm |
0 |
12 |
S-23 |
5.34
mm |
3 |
10 |
S-24 |
4.89
mm |
0 |
10 |
S-25 |
5.83
mm |
0 |
10 |
S-26 |
6.60
mm |
0 |
11 |
S-27 |
6.81
mm |
0 |
10 |
S-28 |
5.62
mm |
4 |
10 |
S-29 |
4.70
mm |
1 |
10 |
S-30 |
5.86
mm |
0 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
S-31 |
5.28
mm |
0 |
9 |
S-32 |
6.06
mm |
4 |
10 |
S-33 |
6.44
mm |
4 |
12 |
S-34 |
6.26
mm |
7 |
8 |
S-35 |
4.97
mm |
4 |
10 |
S-36 |
4.91
mm |
1 |
7 |
S-37 |
7.17
mm |
2 |
9 |
S-38 |
4.58
mm |
4 |
10 |
S-39 |
4.59
mm |
0 |
9 |
S-40 |
4.93
mm |
0 |
10 |
"C"-Center |
5.50
mm |
1 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 3:
Plant Data - Samples, Circle "B"
Edmonton, Canada Crop Circle
September, 1999
|
SAMPLE
# |
MEAN APICAL
NODE LENGTH (mm) |
EXP. CAVITIES/
SAMPLE SET
(Apical Nodes Only) |
NUMBER
PLANTS/SET |
[Circle "B,"
36' - diameter NW circle]
|
S-41 |
5.77 mm |
0 |
9 |
S-42 |
6.90 mm |
0 |
9 |
S-43 |
6.92 mm |
0 |
9 |
S-44 |
6.14 mm |
0 |
10 |
S-45 |
4.93 mm |
3 |
11 |
S-46 |
5.47 mm |
3 |
7 |
S-47 |
5.09 mm |
5 |
10 |
S-48 |
6.38 mm |
0 |
12 |
S-49 |
5.88 mm |
2 |
10 |
S-50 |
5.96 mm |
3 |
10 |
S-51 |
4.43 mm |
0 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
S-52 |
5.98 mm |
4 |
10 |
S-53 |
5.96 mm |
2 |
10 |
S-54 |
5.92 mm |
2 |
10 |
S-55 |
5.64 mm |
0 |
11 |
S-56 |
6.45 mm |
0 |
10 |
S-57 |
3.40 mm |
10 |
10 |
S-58 |
4.95 mm |
5 |
11 |
S-59 |
6.45 mm |
2 |
10 |
S-60 |
5.30 mm |
3 |
9 |
S-61 |
6.04 mm |
2 |
9 |
S-62 |
6.52 mm |
4 |
8 |
S-63 |
4.87 mm |
0 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 4:
Plant Data - Samples, Circle "A"
Edmonton, Canada Crop Circle
September, 1999
|
SAMPLE # |
MEAN APICAL
NODE LENGTH (mm) |
EXP. CAVITIES/
SAMPLE SET
(Apical Nodes Only) |
NUMBER
PLANTS/SET |
[Circle "A,"
19'-diameter NW circle]
|
S-64 |
7.08 mm |
2 |
11 |
S-65 |
6.74 mm |
2 |
9 |
S-66 |
6.94 mm |
2 |
10 |
S-67 |
6.71 mm |
3 |
11 |
S-68 |
7.62 mm |
0 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 5:
Plant Data - Samples, Randomly Downed Area
Edmonton, Canada Crop Circle
September, 1999
|
SAMPLE # |
MEAN APICAL
NODE LENGTH (mm) |
EXP. CAVITIES/
SAMPLE SET
(Apical Nodes Only) |
NUMBER
PLANTS/SET |
|
R-1 |
4.77 mm |
1 |
9 |
R-2 |
5.12 mm |
3 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
X-RAY DIFFRACTION
ANALYSIS:
Dr.
Sampath S.Iyengar, a geochemist/minerologist and X-ray diffraction
and materials science specialist, carried out the clay mineral
extractions and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis at his analytical
materials laboratory (Technology of Materials) in San Diego,
California (now located in Wildomar, CA). Dr. Iyengar was
recommended by a colleague because of his acknowedged expertise
in the XRD technique; it was a further bonus that he was also
totally unacquainted with the crop circle phenomenon or any
of the controversy surrounding it, thus further protecting
this analysis from any experimenter bias.
XRD is regularly used to evaluate degree of crystallinity
in specific clay minerals. As x-rays are refracted from the
sample mounts printed graphs are produced with multiple peaks
which represent specific clay minerals--it is the width of
these peaks, at half-height, which produces the value known
as the Kubler Index (KI), a known indicator of degree of crystallinity
in the sample. As the width of the peak narrows, the KI value
decreases.
Decreases in KI are indicative of increased crystallinity
and, when this change is subtle, large number of samples are
required to prove that the change is statistically significant--and
therefore meaningful. Illite/smectites (because they are the
most expandable of clay minerals and therefore thought to
be the most likely to provide evidence of having been exposed
to heat), and specifically the mica 001 peaks, were examined.
Dr. Iyengar's full report follows below.
Sample:
XRD Spectra from Sample #50
To examine the XRD spectra for each of the samples and/or
controls,
click on the specific Sample or Control number, below:
STATISTICAL
ANALYSIS:
Upon
completion of the XRD work the Kubler Index (KI) data was
submitted to Ohio statistician, Dr. Ravi Raghavan for analysis.
Dr. Raghavan's first objective was to establish whether there
were differences in the KI values between the Edmonton soil
samples and controls and, if there were, to determine whether
these differences were statistically significant.
As stated at the beginning of this report ("Study Results"),
a sharpening of the mica 001 peak (a decrease in the KI, indicating
growth of the illite/mica crystals) was found
in the cropcircle soils, as compared with the control soils.
Further, this increase was found to be statistically significant
at the 95% level of confidence.
Dr. Raghavan was then sent W.C. Levengood's node-length data
and asked whether a correlation existed between the plant
node-length increases and increase in soil crystallinity at
the same sampling locations. The regression analysis indicates
that there is a correlation between Kubler
Index and Node Length, at more than the 99% level of confidence.
Dr. Raghavan's statistical report follows below.
MINERALOGICAL
REVIEW:
We
were extremely fortunate, at this time, to be able to consult
with Dartmouth College geologist/mineralogist Robert C.Reynolds,
Jr., described by his colleagues as "a brilliant scientist
and without any exaggeration ... the best known expert in
the world of X-ray diffraction analysis of finely-dispersed
layer compounds, and first of all, of clay minerals" (D.M.
Moore, "Presentation of the Roebling Medal of the Mineralogical
Society of America for 2000 to Robert Coltart Reynolds, Jr.,
Am. Mineralogist 86:943-45, 2001).
Currently Frederick Hall Professor of Geology and Mineralogy,
Emeritus, Dr. Reynolds examined our work and stated
that he was
"...convinced
that the sample preparation methods and the X-ray analytical
procedures used were consistent with sound, standard methods
of analysis. In short, the data have been obtained by
competent personnel using current equipment."
Reynolds,
however, wondered whether the observed sharpening of the mica
001 peak might be caused by the dehydration of inter-stratified
smectite layers in the crystals and asked that additional
statistical work be carried out to evaluate this possibility.
A paired t-test was then conducted, comparing the KIs in both
the RT and glycolated conditions, but no significant difference
was found with, or without, glycolation, again at the 95%
level of confidence. This was true for each of the sampled
circles individually and all of the sampled circles combined.
Following this
additional statistical inquiry into the possibility that loss
of interstitial water might account for the subtle sharpening
of the mica 001 peak, Reynolds concluded that
"The possibility
of smectite dehydration seems ruled out by the fact that
the data show no systematic increase in peak breadth upon
ethylene glycol solvation of the samples."
Finally,
because Diane Conrad's preliminary work suggested that microwave
exposure (the Kubler Index of her control aliquot decreased
from 0.25 to 0.07 after having been exposed to microwaves
for two minutes) might produce a decrease in the Kubler Index
similar to the decrease she observed in the Logan, Utah circle
samples, we asked Dr. Iyengar to expose a few of our control
samples from the Edmonton formation to microwaves for varying
periods of time to see if we could replicate this effect.
Eight
controls (C-3, C-9, C-12, C-13, C-15, C-16, C-19 and C-23),
for which the KI values were already known, were placed in
a commercial microwave oven for one minute, then ten minutes,
and then 60 minutes, and their KIs again determined. From
the results below it is clear that microwaving produced no
consistent or significant change in KI in these Edmonton control
samples.
Kubler
Index (KI) or Full Width Half Maxima (FWHM) of
Illite/Mica (~10 A) Peak in Microwaved Controls |
Control
# |
RT |
1
Minute |
10
Minutes |
60
Minutes |
C-3 |
(0.18) |
0.17 |
0.16 |
0.17 |
0.19 |
C-9 |
(0.22) |
0.23 |
0.17 |
0.23 |
0.27 |
C-12 |
(0.27) |
0.22 |
0.22 |
0.25 |
0.18 |
C-13 |
(0.23) |
0.20 |
0.19 |
0.22 |
0.26 |
C-15 |
(0.24) |
0.25 |
0.21 |
0.18 |
0.23 |
C-16 |
(0.25) |
0.21 |
0.21 |
0.19 |
0.16 |
C-19 |
(0.29) |
0.21 |
0.19 |
0.20 |
0.20 |
C-23 |
(0.22) |
0.21 |
0.20 |
0.20 |
0.18 |
Numbers in parenthesis
are previously obtained RT values for these controls. |
DISCUSSION:
The study reported here examined both the barley plants (Hordeum
vulgare) and specific clay minerals (illites/smectites)
extracted from surface soils at a 1999 Edmonton, Alberta,
Canada 7-circle crop formation. Both plant and soil samples
were taken at each of 69 sampling locations within three of
the circles (plus two additonal "samples" taken from a randomly-downed
area outside the main formation), and at 24 control locations
75-265' away from the flattened edges of the formation.
In the plants, statistically significant (p <0.01) apical
node-length increases were found in all
of the 71 plant sample sets, compared with the mean of the
controls. Additionally, 68% of the plant samples contained
expulsion cavities in one or several plant stem nodes in each
plant, while none were found in the controls. Based on previous
research (see "Published Papers"), microwave radiation has
been proposed as a possible causative mechanism for the plant
stem changes found in this case, and also consistently in
many other cases around the world over the last 10-12 years.
Clay minerals (illite/smectites) extracted from surface soils
taken at the same sampling locations as the plants, were submitted
to X-ray diffraction analysis, resulting in Kubler Index values
for both the room temperature (RT) and glycolated condtions.
Analysis of the XRD results shows a subtle, but statistically
significant (at the 95% level of confidence), sharpening of
the mica 001 peak in the circle samples, suggesting crystal
growth.
Dr. Reynolds, a world authority in clay minerology, raised
the question as to whether this sharpening of the mica 001
peak might have been caused by the dehydration of interstratified
smectite layers in the crystals. In response to this possibility,
a paired t-test comparing the room temperature (RT) condition
to the glycolated condition was conducted, but smectite dehydration
seems to be ruled out by the fact that the data show no systematic
increase in peak breadth upon ethylene glycol solvation of
the samples (again, at the 95% level of confidence).
In Reynold's words, "the possiblity of crystal growth seems
remote." The degree of pressure known to be involved in causing
crystal growth in sedimentary deposits would have, had it
been present, completely obliterated the plants. And the 600-800ßC
temperatures, over a period several hours, known to be necessary
to promote such crystal growth in the laboratory would have,
in the crop circle field, incinerated any plant material present.
Additionally, the very brief bursts of possibly intense microwave
radiation thought to be the cause of node-elongation and the
creation of expulsion cavities (through heating and expansion
of internal stem moisture) could not account for crystal growth.
And yet statistical analysis reveals both
a subtle decrease in the KI of circle samples as compared
to controls, and a definite correlation
between the KI and Node Length data -- at more
than the 99% level of confidence. It seems evident
that whatever caused the decreased KI (increased crystal growth)
in the clay minerals in the soils was also responsible for
the plant abnormalities.
Our present knowledge provides no explanation for these results.
It is unlikely that an atmospheric plasma vortex system could
account for the changes observed in the clay minerals. The
data, however, rule out direct mechanical flattening of the
crop circle plants by human beings utilizing planks or boards
as an explanation for this event. Control studies carried
out by BLT over the last several years have shown that significant
node-length increase and expulsion cavities do not occur in
crop flattened by boards or planks, human feet or cement rollers,
or to crop which has been 100% over-fertilized. And, since
either geologic pressure and/or intense heat is required to
cause decrease in KI of the clay minerals--and neither can
be produced by planks, boards, cement rollers, feet, etc.--this,
or a similar mechanical mechanism, must be ruled out. It is
our intent to carry out additional plant and soil research
in an attempt to replicate the results of this XRD study,
if funding can be obtained.
It should be mentioned that the farmer/owner of the field
and his wife, as well as an unrelated individual, reported
dramatic aerial light phenomena in the immediate area of this
crop field around the time the formation was discovered, as
well as the fact that cell phone failure was observed during
sampling inside the formation. Reports of similar events at
other cropcircle sites around the world are increasingly common.
Whether these incidents are relevant is not known, but it
is our opinion that they should not be dismissed without investigation
if further scientific study cannot provide an adequate explanation
for the data.
STUDY
PERSONNEL:
|
MIKE
& JUDY ARNDT |
.......................................... |
BLT
Inc. Field-Team |
|
|
DIANE
L. CONRAD |
................................................... |
Geologist |
|
M.S.
in Geological Sciences and Clay Chemistry,
State Univeristy of New York (SUNY) |
|
[thesis:
"Heat Effects on Clay Minerals"] |
|
|
DR.
SAMPATH S. IYENGAR |
................... |
Geochemist/Minerologist |
|
Ph.D
in Materials Chemistry/Minerology, VA Tech
M.S. in Soil Physical Chemistry, VA Tech
|
|
X-ray
diffraction (XRD) and materials science specialist.
Owner/analytical manager of Technology of Materials
Laboratory, San Diego, CA |
|
|
WILLIAM
C. LEVENGOOD |
...................................... |
Biophysicist |
|
M.S
in Biophysics, University of Michigan
M.A. in Bioscience, Ball State University |
|
Has published
three peer-reviewed papers (1994; 1995; 1999) on
plant/soil abnormalities found in crop circles.
Owner/research scientist, Pinelandia Biophysical
Laboratory, Grass Lakes, MI |
|
|
DR.
RAVI RAGHAVAN |
............................. |
Chemical
Engineer/Statistician |
|
Ph.D
in Chemical Engineering, Purdue University |
|
Specialist
in mathematical modeling and computer simulation
of processes.
President of Raghavan & Associates, Inc., Cleveland
|
|
|
DR.
ROBERT C. REYNOLDS, JR |
............... |
Geologist/Clay
Minerologist |
|
Ph.D
in Geology, Washington University |
|
Roebling
Medal Recipient (Mineralogical Society of America,
2000)
Frederick Hall Professor of Geology and Minerology,
Emeritus, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
|
|
|
NANCY
P. TALBOTT |
.......................................... |
Study
Director |
|
Has
co-authored one peer-reviewed paper (1999) on energy
dispersion in crop circle plants. President, BLT
Research Team Inc., Cambridge, MA |
|
|